Social Media Morass
Brian Sankarsingh writes about the negative evolution of social media
Social media has evolved from a simple platform for personal expression into one of the most influential tools for shaping public discourse, culture, and especially politics. While it was once celebrated for democratizing communication, the increasing concentration of control in the hands of a few wealthy oligarchs is raising alarms. The unchecked power these individuals wield over the platforms we rely on has far-reaching consequences for privacy, free speech, democracy, and even societal cohesion. Oligarchs controlling social media platforms wield immense influence over public discourse and political narratives. This can cause these platforms to become echo chambers, amplifying certain viewpoints while suppressing others or promulgating the virtues of one political candidate while deriding all others. The owners of these platforms have the power to manipulate algorithms, prioritize certain content, and even censor speech, all of which can skew political discussions.
In a healthy democracy, the public should have access to a wide range of perspectives to make informed decisions. However, when a small group of elites controls the channels through which most people receive information, it threatens the principle of pluralism. The suppression of diverse opinions and the amplification of certain ideologies can erode the very foundation of democratic values, where the free exchange of ideas is paramount. Social media platforms thrive on engagement, and unfortunately many of their algorithms are designed to prioritize content that provokes strong emotional reactions, such as anger or outrage. Oligarchs controlling these platforms have a vested interest in maintaining high engagement rates to drive profit. This creates a dangerous dynamic where misinformation, sensationalism, and divisive content are amplified.
The owners of these platforms can also influence the flow of information to promote their own political or economic interests. This is especially concerning when these individuals have close ties to political leaders or corporations, leading to conflicts of interest. In such cases, platforms may suppress stories that challenge the status quo or elevate narratives that benefit the oligarchs’ agendas. The control of social media platforms by oligarchs also raises significant concerns about privacy. Many of these platforms collect vast amounts of data on their users, including their browsing habits, personal preferences, and even their locations. This data is often used for targeted advertising, but it can also be exploited for more nefarious purposes, such as surveillance and control. This can then be used to shape user experiences and influence behavior on a massive scale. By knowing intimate details about individuals, one can craft highly personalized content that manipulates users’ thoughts and actions. In extreme cases, this control over personal data can lead to the suppression of dissent or the targeting of activists and political opponents.
When oligarchs control social media platforms, they also consolidate immense economic power. This creates a situation where a handful of billionaires control not only vast financial resources but also the very tools that shape public perception and drive cultural trends. This concentration of power deepens economic inequality and allows these elites to further entrench their dominance. Furthermore, these platforms often prioritize profits over social good. For example, they may resist regulatory efforts that aim to protect consumers, promote transparency, or ensure accountability. This prioritization of profit can lead to the exploitation of users, whether through the commodification of personal data or through unfair business practices that stifle competition.
As platforms become more dominated by corporate interests, discerning users become increasingly skeptical of the information they encounter. The spread of fake news, conspiracy theories, and disinformation undermines public trust in institutions, media, and even social media itself. This distrust has profound consequences. When people no longer believe in the legitimacy of information, they are less likely to engage in constructive dialogue or participate in democratic processes. Instead, they may retreat into isolated online communities where misinformation thrives, further polarizing society and weakening social cohesion. Social media plays a pivotal role in shaping cultural narratives and trends. The people who control these platforms have the power to shape what stories get told and who gets to tell them. They can promote content that aligns with their values or interests while marginalizing voices that challenge their authority or offer alternative perspectives. By monopolizing these narratives, they limit the diversity of voices and perspectives that shape culture, stifling innovation and creativity. The result is a more homogenized culture that reflects the values of a select few rather than the collective experiences of a diverse population.
Bio: BRIAN SANKARSINGH is a Trinidadian-born Canadian immigrant who has published several books of poetry on a wide range of social and historical themes including racism, colonialism, and enslavement. Sankarsingh artfully blends prose and poetry into his storytelling creating an eclectic mix with both genres. This unique approach is sure to provide something for everyone.
Thanks for reading Seeking Veritas by The Professor, The Poet & Friends! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.